Prevalence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients with chronic pancreatitis without follow-up. PANCR-EVOL Study / Prevalencia de insuficiencia pancreática exocrina en pacientes con pancreatitis crónica sin segruimiento. Estudio PANCR-EVOL

Background/objectives. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is an important complication of chronic pancreatitis (CP). Guidelines recommend to rule out EPI in CP, to detect those patients who would benefit from pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of EPI in patients with CP without follow-up in the last 2 years and to describe their nutritional status and quality of life (QoL). Methods. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter Spanish study. CP patients without follow-up by a gastroenterologist or surgeon in at least 2 years were included. EPI was defined as fecal elastase test <200mcg/g. For nutritional assessment, laboratory and anthropometric data were obtained. QoL was investigated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results. 64 patients (mean age 58.8±10.3 years, 85.9% men) from 10 centers were included. Median time since diagnosis of CP was 58.7 months [37.7-95.4]. Forty-one patients (64.1%) had EPI. Regarding nutritional status, the following differences were observed (EPI vs. Non-EPI): BMI (23.9±3.5kg/m2 vs. 25.7±2.5, p=0.03); glucose (121 [96-189] mg/dL vs. 98 [90-116], p=0.006); HbA1c 6.6% [6.0-8.4] vs. 5.5 [5.3-6.0], p=0.0005); Vitamin A (0.44mg/L [0.35-0.57] vs. 0.53 [0.47-0.63], p=0.048) and Vitamin E (11.2±5.0μg/ml vs. 14.4±4.3, p=0.03). EPI group showed a worse EORTC QLQ-C30 score on physical (93.3 [66.7-100] vs. 100 [93.3-100], p=0.048) and cognitive function (100 [83.3-100] vs. 100 [100-100], p=0.04). Conclusions. Prevalence of EPI is high in patients with CP without follow-up. EPI group had higher levels of glucose, lower levels of vitamins A and E and worse QoL (AU)

Antecedentes/objetivos. la insuficiencia pancreática exocrina (IPE) es una importante complicación de la pancreatitis crónica (PC). Las guías recomiendan el seguimiento de la IPE en PC, para identificar a aquellos pacientes que puedan beneficiarse del tratamiento enzimático sustitutivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la prevalencia de IPE en pacientes con PC sin seguimiento en los últimos 2 años y describir su estado nutricional y calidad de vida (QoL). Métodos. estudio trasversal, multicéntrico, español. Se incluyeron pacientes con PC sin seguimiento por un gastroenterólogo/cirujano en los últimos 2años. Se definió IPE como elastasa fecal<200mcg/g. Se recogieron parámetros de laboratorio y datos antropométricos para el análisis nutricional. Para la evaluación de QoL se utilizó el cuestionario EORTC QLQ-C30. Resultados. se incluyeron prospectivamente 64 pacientes (58,8±10,3 años, media 85,9%) de 10 centros. Tiempo medio desde el diagnóstico de PC: 58,7meses [37,7-95,4]. 41 pacientes (64,1%) tenían IPE. Estado nutricional: se observaron las siguientes diferencias (IPE vs No-IPE): IMC (23,9±3,5kg/m2 vs. 25,7±2,5,p=0,03); glucosa 121 [96-189] mg/dL vs. 98 [90-116];p =0,006); HbA1c 6,6% [6,0-8,4] vs. 5,5 [5,3-6,0],p=0,0005); Vitamina-A (0,44mg/L [0,35-0,57] vs. 0,53 [0,47-0,63],p=0,048), Vitamina-E (11,2±5,0μg/ml vs. 14,4±4,3,p=0,03). El grupo de IPE mostró una peor puntuación en el EORTC QLQ-C30 en las funciones física (93,3 [66,7-100] vs. 100 [93,3-100], p=0,048) y cognitiva (100 [83,3-100] vs. 100 [100-100],p=0,04). Conclusiones. la prevalencia de IPE en pacientes con PC sin seguimiento es elevada. En el grupo de IPE se observaron niveles elevados de glucosa, bajos de vitaminas A y E y peor calidad de vida (AU)

Prevalence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients with chronic pancreatitis without follow-up. PANCR-EVOL Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is an important complication of chronic pancreatitis (CP). Guidelines recommend to rule out EPI in CP, to detect those patients who would benefit from pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of EPI in patients with CP without follow-up in the last 2 years and to describe their nutritional status and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter Spanish study. CP patients without follow-up by a gastroenterologist or surgeon in at least 2 years were included. EPI was defined as fecal elastase test <200mcg/g. For nutritional assessment, laboratory and anthropometric data were obtained. QoL was investigated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. RESULTS: 64 patients (mean age 58.8±10.3 years, 85.9% men) from 10 centers were included. Median time since diagnosis of CP was 58.7 months [37.7-95.4]. Forty-one patients (64.1%) had EPI. Regarding nutritional status, the following differences were observed (EPI vs. Non-EPI): BMI (23.9±3.5kg/m2 vs. 25.7±2.5, p=0.03); glucose (121 [96-189] mg/dL vs. 98 [90-116], p=0.006); HbA1c 6.6% [6.0-8.4] vs. 5.5 [5.3-6.0], p=0.0005); Vitamin A (0.44mg/L [0.35-0.57] vs. 0.53 [0.47-0.63], p=0.048) and Vitamin E (11.2±5.0µg/ml vs. 14.4±4.3, p=0.03). EPI group showed a worse EORTC QLQ-C30 score on physical (93.3 [66.7-100] vs. 100 [93.3-100], p=0.048) and cognitive function (100 [83.3-100] vs. 100 [100-100], p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of EPI is high in patients with CP without follow-up. EPI group had higher levels of glucose, lower levels of vitamins A and E and worse QoL.

Medication adherence and persistence in type 2 diabetes mellitus: perspectives of patients, physicians and pharmacists on the Spanish health care system.

OBJECTIVE: A good relationship between diabetes patients and their health care team is crucial to ensure patients' medication adherence and self-management. To this end, we aimed to identify and compare the views of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, physicians and pharmacists concerning the factors and strategies that may be associated with, or could improve, medication adherence and persistence. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronic self-administered questionnaire comprising 11 questions (5-point Likert scale) concerning factors and strategies related to medication adherence. The survey was designed for T2DM patients and Spanish National Health System professionals. RESULTS: A total of 963 T2DM patients, 998 physicians and 419 pharmacists participated in the study. Overall, a lower proportion of pharmacists considered the proposed factors associated with medication adherence important as compared to patients and physicians. It should be noted that a higher percentage of physicians in comparison to pharmacists perceived that "complexity of medication" (97% vs 76.6%, respectively) and "adverse events" (97.5% vs 72.2%, respectively) were important medication-related factors affecting adherence. In addition, both patients (80.8%) and physicians (80.8%) agreed on the importance of "cost and co-payment" for adherence, whereas only 48.6% of pharmacists considered this factor important. It is also noteworthy that nearly half of patients (43%) agreed that "to adjust medication to activities of daily living" was the best strategy to reduce therapeutic complexity, whereas physicians believed that "reducing the frequency of administration" (47.9%) followed by "reducing the number of tablets" (28.5%) was the most effective strategy to improve patients' adherence. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the need for pharmacists to build a stronger relationship with physicians in order to improve patients monitoring and adherence rates. Additionally, these findings may help to incorporate greater patient-centeredness when developing management strategies, focusing on adjusting medication regimens to patients' daily lives.

Percepción farmacéutica del uso de analgésicos y su práctica en dolor leve-moderado. Encuesta DOLOR-OFF / Pharmacist perception of the use of analgesics and their practice on mild-moderate pain. DOLOR-OFF survey

OBJETIVO: Determinar la percepción del farmacéutico comunitario sobre el uso de analgésicos y evaluar la práctica farmacéutica en dolor leve-moderado prestada en farmacias comunitarias españolas. DISEÑO: Se realizó un estudio observacional transversal, método encuesta, entre abril y septiembre de 2013. Emplazamiento: Un total de 696 farmacias comunitarias de 20 comunidades autónomas españolas. PARTICIPANTES: Farmacéuticos comunitarios con experiencia profesional mínima de un año. MEDICIONES PRINCIPALES: Caracterización de la demanda de analgésicos, del usuario de analgésicos y de la intervención farmacéutica en dolor leve-moderado desde la perspectiva del farmacéutico comunitario. RESULTADOS: En base a la práctica farmacéutica el 45% de los pacientes con dolor acuden a la farmacia a retirar un medicamento con receta médica. La patología más consultada es el dolor de cabeza (35%). El 21% de los usuarios de analgésicos se automedican. El ibuprofeno y el paracetamol son los fármacos más utilizados. El 39% de los farmacéuticos afirman seguir un protocolo de indicación. Se encontró correlación entre la experiencia profesional del farmacéutico y los indicadores de proceso de indicación (Fisher p < 0,05). El 88% de los farmacéuticos verifican 2 indicadores del servicio de dispensación. El 15% de los farmacéuticos derivan al médico. CONCLUSIONES: Se diferencian 3 grupos mayoritarios de usuarios de analgésicos según solicite el servicio de indicación, dispensación o se automedique. Se requiere una mayor formación de los farmacéuticos en protocolos de dolor individualizados a los perfiles de pacientes identificados y en criterios de derivación al médico, que permitan asegurar de manera sistemática la utilización correcta de analgésicos y la obtención de resultados clínicos positivos

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of analgesics, from the perspective of the pharmacist community, and pharmaceutical practice in mild-moderate pain. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, observational study was performed between April and September 2013. SETTING: 696 community pharmacies in 20 Spanish provinces. PARTICIPANTS: Community pharmacists with a minimum professional experience of one year. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Characterisation of the demand for analgesics, analgesic users, and pharmaceutical intervention for mild-moderate pain from the perspective of the pharmaceutical community. RESULTS: The main reason why a patient with mild-moderate pain visits a pharmacy is to receive a drug with prescription (45.5%), and the most common condition is headache (35.2%). Ibuprofen and paracetamol are the most commonly used drugs for mild-moderate pain. More than one-third (38.9%) of pharmacists follow a protocol for counselling. A correlation was found between the pharmacist's professional experience and the application of counselling process (Fisher P < .05). Some 87.8% of pharmacists checked two indicators from the dispensing service, and only 1.3% did not check any. Referral to a physician was made by 14.8% of pharmacists, with the main reason being the detection of alarm indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Protocols need to be designed and adapted to the characteristics of the 3 profiles identified, in order to increase the efficiency of pharmaceutical services in mild-moderate pain relief. Practical and specific training in pain are required to implement services to ensure the correct and systemic use of analgesics and positive clinical outcomes

[Pharmacist perception of the use of analgesics and their practice on mild-moderate pain. DOLOR-OFF survey]. / Percepción farmacéutica del uso de analgésicos y su práctica en dolor leve-moderado. Encuesta DOLOR-OFF.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of analgesics, from the perspective of the pharmacist community, and pharmaceutical practice in mild-moderate pain. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, observational study was performed between April and September 2013. SETTING: 696 community pharmacies in 20 Spanish provinces. PARTICIPANTS: Community pharmacists with a minimum professional experience of one year. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Characterisation of the demand for analgesics, analgesic users, and pharmaceutical intervention for mild-moderate pain from the perspective of the pharmaceutical community. RESULTS: The main reason why a patient with mild-moderate pain visits a pharmacy is to receive a drug with prescription (45.5%), and the most common condition is headache (35.2%). Ibuprofen and paracetamol are the most commonly used drugs for mild-moderate pain. More than one-third (38.9%) of pharmacists follow a protocol for counselling. A correlation was found between the pharmacist's professional experience and the application of counselling process (Fisher P<.05). Some 87.8% of pharmacists checked two indicators from the dispensing service, and only 1.3% did not check any. Referral to a physician was made by 14.8% of pharmacists, with the main reason being the detection of alarm indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Protocols need to be designed and adapted to the characteristics of the 3 profiles identified, in order to increase the efficiency of pharmaceutical services in mild-moderate pain relief. Practical and specific training in pain are required to implement services to ensure the correct and systemic use of analgesics and positive clinical outcomes.

Patient-reported outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: patients' and primary care physicians' perspectives in the Spanish health care system.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding patients' and physicians' perceptions of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management and treatment has important implications for diabetes care, allowing the identification of clinical practice issues that could be improved, leading to patients' better understanding of the illness and, consequently, healthier self-management behaviors. The objective of this study was to identify differences between physicians' and T2DM patients' perceptions related to health status, patient-reported outcomes assessments, and T2DM management and treatment, in routine clinical practice in Spain. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional study including 1,012 T2DM patients and 974 physicians from 47 and 52 Spanish provinces, respectively. An electronic structured self-administered questionnaire containing 17 questions was designed aiming to address both physicians' and patient's perceptions on overall T2DM health status and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: T2DM patients perceived a worse health status (40% reported having a "good" and 38% a "neither good nor bad" health status) compared with physicians' perceptions (77% thought patients had a "good" health status). Most patients answered being "satisfied" or "neither satisfied nor unsatisfied" with the given information, while physicians considered that patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the information for self-monitoring blood glucose and treatment administration. Fifty-seven percent of patients reported that medical recommendations were "important", while 58% of physicians considered it as "very important". Fifty-three percent of patients perceived that their current T2DM treatment suited their preferences "quite a lot", and this was lower than the proportion of physicians (69%) that believed this for their patients. Additionally, a lower percentage of patients (53%) than physicians (79%) believed that their treatment improved their health-related quality of life "quite a lot". All differences between patients and physicians were statistically significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients and physicians demonstrate different views concerning all questions related to T2DM health status and diabetes management and treatment (information, recommendations, satisfaction, and preferences).